Why Has No One Compared Bernie Sanders to Teddy Roosevelt?

Introduction

The political landscape is often littered with comparisons, with some figures being elevated to legendary status by historians and contemporaries alike. However, one political comparison that hasn't been widely discussed is the juxtaposition of Bernie Sanders and Teddy Roosevelt. This article explores the reasons behind this lack of comparison and highlights the key differences between the two.

The Absence of Comparison: A Closer Look

While there have been occasional mentions of comparing Bernie Sanders to other historical figures, the comparison to Teddy Roosevelt has been notably absent. There are several reasons for this:

The fundamental differences in their political philosophies and methods of achieving their goals. The media focus on comparing Sanders more to FDR, who represents the New Deal era, rather than to the Progressive era of TR. The shifting nature of political landscapes, where contemporary discussions prioritize recent historical figures over long-ago ones.

The Differences: Methodology and Vision

While both Bernie Sanders and Teddy Roosevelt are passionate and dedicated to their beliefs, the methods they use to achieve their goals and the visions they hold are starkly different. Sanders, with his socialist leanings and calls for government action, aims to implement his policies through the force of law. On the other hand, Teddy Roosevelt emerged as a symbol of the Progressive era, advocating for regulatory reforms and a more active government role in mitigating corporate monopolies and promoting social welfare.

The core issue with Sanders from a historical perspective is his failure to acknowledge the foundational principles of the American rise to greatness. The nation, which achieved its prosperity through competition and innovation, finds it difficult to adapt to the egalitarianism of socialism. This is a key point of contrast with TR, who emphasized the importance of a balanced and free market while also advocating for the welfare of the people.

The Debate: Breaking Up Big Banks and Egalitarianism

The idea of breaking up big banks has gained traction, with some attributing its beginnings to Bernie Sanders. While Sanders does advocate for breaking up large financial institutions, the debate surrounding this issue has been low-key compared to more widespread discussions of economic policy.

Some have drawn parallels between Sanders and other prominent figures like Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson. These comparisons are apt, as all have made significant impacts on U.S. history. However, a comparison with TR would highlight unique aspects of the Progressive era and the challenges of implementing socialist policies in a competitive economy.

A Personal Perspective

It's important to note that personal opinions play a role in the discourse. The statement 'Bernie is not half the man Teddy was' reflects a subjective viewpoint. This type of statement can be polarizing, but it's a valid opinion based on personal beliefs. Similarly, the idea that TR never counseled anyone to 'suck at the govt teat' highlights a perceived generational difference in governance and political culture.

Regardless of personal views, a modern-day comparison between Sanders and TR touches on fundamental questions about the role of government in society and the balance between individual enterprise and collective welfare.

Conclusion

While the comparison of Bernie Sanders to Teddy Roosevelt has been sparse, this article seeks to shed light on the reasons behind this absence. It is clear that both figures have significant legacies and that a closer examination of their similarities and differences can provide valuable insights into the evolving nature of American politics.