Why Did Not Grand Maester Pycelle Sabotage Summerhall's Experiment?

The Tragedy of Summerhall remains one of the most captivating mysteries in the A Song of Ice and Fire series, prompting countless discussions and theories among fans. A prevalent but unsupported theory claims that Grand Maester Pycelle was involved in sabotaging the Summerhall experiment. However, upon closer examination of the evidence and background, this theory does not hold substantial basis.

No Evidence of Pycelle's Involvement

The idea that Grand Maester Pycelle was sabotaging the Summerhall experiment lacks any concrete evidence or reasoned argument. The Maesters, including Pycelle, were deeply entrenched in the principles of ethical and responsible practice. It goes without saying that any form of da?mon-like interference in a critical experiment would be highly questionable and contrary to the maesters' vows and codes.

Lack of Presence and Means

Historically, Maester Pycelle was based at King's Landing during the relevant time period of the Summerhall experiment. He had no physical presence at Summerhall, making it nearly impossible for him to have any direct involvement. The separation between the maesters in King's Landing and the secluded Maesters working in Summerhall underscores this point.

No Motivation for Sabotage

Furthermore, Pycelle, known for his pragmatic and cautious nature, would have no conceivable motivation to sabotage an experiment that had the potential to achieve significant advancements. The maesters as a whole were dedicated to the preservation and advancement of knowledge, not its destruction. Any harm that could arise would likely have adversely affected the entire realm, potentially leading to widespread panic and unrest.

Subtle Actions and the Role of the Citadel

Although there have been rumors suggesting the Citadel's involvement in the possible extinction of dragons, these reports also point to indirect methods such as poisons. Forging conspiracy theories that implicate the Citadel in subtle manipulation proposes more sophisticated scheming but also introduces significant areas of uncertainty.

Impugning the Citadel with direct sabotage, particularly with the dangerous weapon that is wildfire, would be a grossly audacious and risky move. The Maesters, especially those in high positions like Pycelle, understand the immense danger and unpredictability of such a volatile substance. Deliberately orchestrating an event with wildfire would not only be a failure of responsibility but would also result in massive destruction and loss of life.

Alternatives to Pycelle as Blame

Possibly, the problem lies with a different maester, such as Gyldayn, the Maester at Summerhall. Gyldayn, despite being the immediate target of suspicion, is also handicapped by the risks associated with the wildfire. The loss of his life in a grim event such as Summerhall highlights that any maester would have had to be extremely careful, and the risks might have been too high.

And finally, while Gyldayn’s motives and proximity to the incident might offer tantalizing angles for a story, it is important to recognize that any direct sabotage with highly volatile materials would be a colossal moral, practical, and strategic blunder.

In conclusion, based on the evidence and logical reasoning, it is highly unlikely that Grand Maester Pycelle was involved in the sabotaging of the Summerhall experiment. Any theories that implicating him or other maesters should be grounded in sound evidence and well-thought-out arguments.