Who is the True Lord of the Rings? Exploring the Complexity of Power and Identity

In J.R.R. Tolkien's legendarium, the title 'The Lord of the Rings' can be seen as a play on words with deeper meaning. While many fans might immediately think of Sauron as the true Lord of the Rings due to his clear intentions of control and dominance, delving into the complexities of the narrative reveals a more nuanced understanding of power and identity.

In the Story

Within J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings," the One Ring created by Sauron is often a central focus. It serves as a powerful symbol of his authority and his ultimate goal of complete domination over Middle-earth. Sauron himself is the true ontological Lord of the Rings, as his own power within the Ring bound the other Rings to the One. The One Ring is an extension of Sauron, a part of him, and contains a significant portion of his innate power.

Symbolically

However, the concept of 'Lordship' in the context of the 'Lord of the Rings' can also be interpreted symbolically. Some fans argue that the true Lord of the Rings is not a single individual but rather the idea of power itself, as embodied by Sauron. This perspective emphasizes the darker aspects of power and the destruction it can bring, especially as seen through the transformation of Gollum from Sméagol, who is no longer fully himself due to the Ring's corrupting influence.

Cultural Impact

In a broader cultural sense, the phrase 'Lord of the Rings' transcends the confines of Tolkien's story. It has become a symbol of power, control, and the ultimate stakes of the conflict between good and evil. This cultural impact is evident in various forms of media, from literature to film, where the concept resonates with audiences.

Insights from the Fellowship of the Ring

The conflict between Sauron and other characters, such as Frodo Baggins, is central to 'The Lord of the Rings.' Frodo, despite being the holder of the One Ring, is not the true Lord of the Rings. This is exemplified in Frodo's vision at Mount Doom, detailed in 'The History of Middle-earth' Vol. 9, where he envisions writing poems and songs that would make the Earth blossom, and sharing his powers with friends. This act would make him an 'outsider' guided by the spirit of the Wolf, thereby avoiding the 'searching on his own' clause and maintaining his role as an external force.

In 'The Fellowship of the Ring' (Book 2, Chapter 1, "Many Meetings"), the theme of naming and power is explored. When Pippin exclaims, 'Hurray! Here is our noble cousin! Make way for Frodo Lord of the Ring!', Gandalf quickly counters by saying, 'Evil things do not come into this valley, but all the same we should not name them. The Lord of the Ring is not Frodo, but the master of the Dark Tower of Mordor whose power is again stretching out over the world! We are sitting in a fortress. Outside it is getting dark.' This highlights the difference between claiming a title and the true nature of power.

Gandalf's cautionary remarks about not naming the enemy, despite the apparent danger, underscores the complex nature of power dynamics in Middle-earth. Gandalf's words serve as a reminder that naming the true Lord of the Ring is more significant than any individual, including Frodo, can claim.

Conclusion

The question of who the true Lord of the Rings is can be answered in multiple ways, depending on the context and perspective. While Sauron is clearly the creator and binder of the Ring, the title's broader implications reflect on the nature of power and the moral stakes within the narrative.

Further Reading

For a deeper understanding of the themes and characters in 'The Lord of the Rings,' readers are encouraged to explore Tolkien's work, especially his appendices and the appendices to 'The Lord of the Rings,' as well as related critical analyses.