Who Was the Crooked Warrior Between Arjuna and Karna in the Mahabharata?

The Mahabharata is a rich tapestry of ancient Indian mythology and warfare, narrating the great battle between the Kauravas and Pandavas for the throne of Hastinapur. In this epic, both Arjuna and Karna are depicted as formidable warriors, but the question often arises, who was the crooked warrior between Arjuna and Karna?

The Case for Karna

Karna, known for his unflinching bravery and uncountable victories, is often portrayed as a warrior who upheld the code of conduct and honor. However, there are instances that highlight his less noble actions during the battle. One such instance was his attack on Abhimanyu, a young warrior, within the group attack strategy, which was indeed a common practice among the Kaurava and Pandava forces. Despite this, Karna's fair confrontation with Arjuna, where he broke the divine Rudra bow of Abhimanyu, stands as a testament to his prowess and fairness in battle.

Another incident often debated is his attack on Duryodhana, where Karna acted as a shield behind a woman, which is generally considered an unfair tactic. This action, though strategically sound, raises ethical questions about his conduct in warfare.

The Case for Arjuna

Arjuna, revered as one of the greatest archers and warriors in the Mahabharata, is frequently described as a crooked warrior due to several unfair actions during the battle. One of the most notorious instances is his attack on Bhishma, whom he hid behind a woman to exploit his shield, directly violating the code of conduct in warfare. Similarly, Arjuna's actions in battle against other warriors such as Bhagdatta, Bhurishrava, and his confrontations with Karna also highlight his tendency towards unfair combat tactics.

During the 14th day of the battle, Arjuna was particularly crooked. He attacked Karna when he was talking with Bhima, causing him to get injured. After Karna resumed the fight with Arjuna, Bhima broke his bow, and Arjuna attempted to kill an unarmed Karna, which is another example of his unfair conduct in the battlefield. Additionally, Arjuna's unfair killing of Vrishasena and Karna, albeit weaponless, demonstrates his tendency towards unethical warfare.

Debating the Authenticity of Accounts

Several sources in the Mahabharata, such as Balarama, the brother of Krishna, and Bhima himself, have different perspectives on the nature of Arjuna and Karna's actions. Balarama, a noble warrior, has portrayed Bhima as a crooked warrior for his actions against Duryodhana during a mace fight. Bhima himself is often described as unfair, especially when he defeated Dhuryodhana when the latter was helpless and unarmed.

Krishna and Bhishma, respected by their kindred spirits, have also provided their perspectives. Krishna notably considered Arjuna and Karna to be equally skilled in battle, indicating a balance of abilities between the two warriors. Bhishma, a great general and warrior himself, also portrayed Karna and Arjuna as being on par, suggesting that neither could be solely categorized as a crooked warrior based on their battlefield behavior.

The most controversial incident involving Karna was his attempt to run away when he realized his weapon would not work due to a curse. This action, though desperate, emphasizes his reluctance to continue the battle under unfavorable circumstances, which some might see as a weak point in his character.

Conclusion

The characterization of Arjuna and Karna as crooked warriors is a matter of perspective and the specific incidents highlighted. While Karna is often seen as more heroic and honorable, Arjuna's unfair tactics during the battle of Mahabharata have made him the subject of more criticism. Ultimately, the distinction between the two warriors highlights the complex nature of warfare and the lapses in conduct that even great warriors can face.