The Strange Delay of the 29-Page Memo Detailing Election Irregularities in Fulton County, Georgia

Why has it taken so long for the 29-page memo, purportedly detailing election irregularities in Fulton County, Georgia, to surface? The document in question is a peculiar piece, filled with overly detailed bullet points that seem more like the notes of a private investigator rather than a formal governmental report. This article delves into why the memo has taken so long to become public, the motivations behind its delayed release, and the relevance of such a document in the context of the 2020 election.

The Document and Its Origins

The memo in question is a 29-page document filled with bullet points that note various "irregularities" in the 2020 election. Each page is stamped with the logo and name of Seven Hills Strategies, a private contractor hired to observe the election. According to their website, Seven Hills Strategies is a firm headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, known for representing clients on both coasts on social enterprise, impact investing, and nonprofit strategies.

A Question of Integrity

One of the most striking aspects of the memo is the attempt to solicit donations from readers via a pop-up as soon as they access the site. This is particularly unimpressive, given the association with conservative causes. It raises questions about the integrity of the content and the motives behind its release. True journalism prioritizes facts over spin, yet this document seems more concerned with fundraising than reporting.

Carte Jones and Seven Hills Strategies

The author of the memo, Carter Jones, is the founder and owner of Seven Hills Strategies. While a Bob Jones is listed as a principal, it is likely a relative. The company's mission statement, described as "pure gobbledygook," is not particularly enlightening. Given the lack of concrete information about the company's operations, it is reasonable to question the credibility of the document and the author's intentions.

The Content of the Memo

The content of the memo leaves much to be desired. The irregularities noted could have been and probably were cleared up in the initial three days after the document was submitted. Many of the points are neither damning nor groundbreaking, suggesting that the document's release was not driven by a significant discovery. Rather, it appears that the company leaked the memo to gain attention.

Lack of Follow-Up and Relevance

Despite the claims of follow-up work, it is unclear whether a similar memo was produced for other Georgia counties. The absence of similar documents for other regions raises questions about the scope and legitimacy of the observations. Furthermore, the document's release lacks the urgency expected from a governmental report, leading to the conclusion that it was not authored by the Secretary of State's office.

Legal and Moral Considerations

The delayed release of the memo and the attempt to fundraise via the content are morally and legally questionable. The authors of such documents must ensure that the information is accurate, relevant, and transparent. The lack of transparency and the use of fundraising tactics are not in line with ethical journalism standards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the 29-page memo detailing election irregularities in Fulton County, Georgia, has taken an inordinate amount of time to surface. While it provides some level of transparency, the document's content and the circumstances of its release warrant further investigation. The lack of credible sources backing up the claims and the attempt to fundraise via the content are red flags that require additional scrutiny. The delay in the release of this document could be attributed to the motivations of the authors rather than a genuine effort to improve transparency in the election process.