The Significance of Michael Cohen's Plea: Lying for Trump and Its Implications

Michael Cohen, the former lawyer and fixer for President Donald Trump, recently admitted to lying to Congress. This admission has raised numerous questions about the significance of his actions and their legal implications. However, it's crucial to understand the full context of Cohen's lies and their intended outcomes.

Michael Cohen's Admission: An Old Story

Michael Cohen has already admitted to lying for Trump, and it's not a new revelation. In fact, his previous admissions to perjury have been well-documented. The claim that Cohen's admission is significant is somewhat misleading. Prior testimonies from the prosecution’s own witnesses have shown that Cohen was not an angel; he had a long history of being involved in questionable activities to benefit Trump.

Intentions Behind Cohen's Lies

The lies Cohen told to Congress were specifically intended to bolster Trump's image or prevent negative publicity. These were not self-serving lies; rather, they were meant to protect Trump's interests. Notably, Cohens lies did not benefit him personally at the time they were told, and they certainly did not help his case once he was charged.

Legal Consequences: Perjury and Campaign Finance Law

An American lawyer would be a better source to provide information on the penalties for perjury. However, it's important to note that perjury carries a potential penalty, though the specific details would depend on jurisdiction and the circumstances surrounding the case.

Michael Cohen is already serving a three-year prison sentence, and it's uncertain whether further punishment is warranted. The truth has already been revealed, and the cat is out of the bag.

The Specific Charge: Violation of Campaign Finance Law

The only aspect of Cohen's plea that pertains directly to Trump is the payment made to Stormy Daniels, which was allegedly a violation of campaign finance law. However, it's unlikely that this will be used to bring charges against Trump. The Justice Department has already tried to prosecute someone else for a similar payment, and they ultimately ruled that it was a reasonable act for a married man to want to hide a mistress, and for a friend to help in this mission.

For Cohen to be brought to trial for this charge, the prosecution would need to prove that Trump's sole intention in paying Stormy Daniels was to prevent it from affecting the campaign. This would be an extremely challenging task, given the lack of direct and compelling evidence.

Conclusion

Michael Cohen's admission to lying for Trump has significant legal and political implications. His actions were primarily motivated by a desire to protect Trump's image and interests, rather than personal gain. The legal consequences of his actions have been severe, with a three-year prison sentence. As his sentencing is set to take place in a few weeks, there is little doubt that Attorney General William Barr, through his special counsel, Robert Mueller, will recommend leniency given Cohen's cooperation.

It remains to be seen whether these actions will provide any substantial legal consequences for Trump, but the shedding of light on criminal behavior is undoubtedly significant in its own right.