The Grapes of Wrath: Why It Was Banned in Public Schools

The novel 'The Grapes of Wrath' by John Steinbeck has faced accusations of censorship and banning in some public schools. This article delves into the reasons behind these controversies and the broader implications of such censored literature in education.

Background and Popularity of The Grapes of Wrath

'The Grapes of Wrath' is a seminal work in American literature, published in 1939. Though it has garnered critical acclaim and remains popular, some school boards and politicians have attempted to ban it, particularly in certain areas of the United States.

Banning and Controversy

The book's ban is often attributed to its political themes and realistic portrayal of the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl. The novel depicts the struggles of the Joad family as they migrate across the country in search of work and a better life. This narrative has tapped into complex societal issues, leading to disagreements about its appropriateness in various educational contexts.

Reasons for Banning

The reasons for banning are multifaceted. Some argue that the book's themes and content are too politically charged, while others find specific scenes controversial. For instance, some question the depiction of human sacrifice and beastiality, comparing it to other controversial texts like the Bible. However, critics often overlook the novel's progressive and moral messages.

Educational Impact

Despite efforts to ban 'The Grapes of Wrath,' it has remained a significant part of American literature. The novel's portrayal of unity and moral integrity resonates with readers, making it an important educational tool. Educators appreciate the book's ability to foster critical thinking and discuss societal issues.

Illustrative Examples

The attempts to ban 'The Grapes of Wrath' are not isolated to a single region. For instance, Sarah Palin, the former Governor of Alaska, faced backlash for attempting to ban the book in her state. Cartoonists often poked fun at Palin's stance, highlighting her lack of understanding of democratic processes and her political biases.

One such cartoon depicted Palin's denial of climate change, which is ironic given the novel's focus on environmental devastation and the resilience of the human spirit. Other cartoons criticized her policies and stances, particularly her view on abortion, oil drilling, and government workings.

Conclusion

While the ban on 'The Grapes of Wrath' in certain schools may reflect local political climates and social biases, it underscores the broader debate about the role of literature in education. The pros and cons of such bans highlight the importance of open dialogue and critical reading in fostering informed and empathetic citizens.

Keywords: The Grapes of Wrath, censorship, public school banning, literature