The Complex Mystery of Trump’s Relationship with Robert Mueller

There has been much speculation surrounding the complex relationship between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Special Counsel Robert Mueller during the height of the Russia investigation. This article aims to dissect the motivations behind Trump’s original desire to fire Mueller and his subsequent decision not to, by examining the political, personal, and psychological factors at play.

The Trump-Russia Investigation: A ‘Set-Up’ or Justifiable Concern?

Some believe that the Trump-Russia investigation was a set-up, with personal animus among Mueller’s team enhancing their efforts against the President. This belief was fueled by the systemic dislike for Trump among his opponents, making it easier for Trump’s supporters to discredit the investigation. However, the reality is more nuanced. The presence of pre-existing bias in a deep-dive investigation should trigger the need for recusal, a fundamental principle in legal and investigative ethics.

The Motive Behind Firing Mueller: Political Shenanigans and Corruption

During the Russia investigation, Trump was deeply concerned about the uncovering of his administration's hidden corruption. Mueller’s investigation brought to light numerous shady practices and personal misconduct within his government. The fear of public exposure of these actions included the potential for impeachment, which was a significant deterrent. The pressure was mounting, and Trump, driven by a fear of both public backlash and political destruction, may have initially wanted to terminate the investigation to protect himself.

Public Display of Creeping Incompetence

Trump’s attempts to interfere with the investigation were clear during his interactions with the personnel involved. For instance, his deliberate attempt to get Democratic supporters to assist in creating false narratives about Mueller’s investigation demonstrates his strategic, yet incompetent, handling of the situation. It shows a lack of understanding of how political processes work, further fueling public perceptions of incompetence.

The Complexity of Human Psychology: Anger and Self-Preservation

It is not uncommon for individuals to make impulsive statements or decisions out of anger or frustration, only to regret them later. Trump, like many of us, may have been affected by these emotions, leading him to issue orders and messages that he later regretted. The example of Don McGahn refusing to deliver Trump’s messages is a prime illustration of how even the most trusted advisors can stand their ground.

Memories of the Past and the Fear of Political Backlash

The Saturday Night Massacre of 1973 under Richard Nixon remains a stark reminder of the political ramifications of such actions. Both Trump and his advisors were likely aware of this historical event, which could lead them to hesitate in making drastic decisions to impede the investigation. The fear of a similar backlash could have played a significant role in Trump’s decision not to proceed with the termination of Mueller’s investigation.

Moreover, the potential for political capital was another factor. While many criticized Mueller’s actions, the report itself did provide Trump with a chance to craft his defense against the allegations, which he did through his legal team and public statements. This was a strategic move that could not be ignored.

In conclusion, the motives behind Trump’s desire to fire Robert Mueller and his subsequent decision not to involve a complex interplay of personal, political, and psychological elements. While the initial drive may have been to shield his administration from exposure, the multifaceted response to the Russian investigation highlights a desire for self-preservation, an awareness of public sentiment, and a strategic move to protect his legacy.