Tagg Inferno vs Tagg Inferno 2.0: A Comprehensive Review

Never having used the original Tagg Inferno before, all that remains are the positive reviews, such as its waterproofing, 20-hour battery life, and slightly better sound quality. However, the upgraded version, Tagg Inferno 2.0, comes with a higher price tag and additional features. In this article, I will compare the two models, focusing on their sound quality, noise cancellation capabilities, and individual experiences of users.

Sound Quality

User experience with the Tagg Inferno 2.0 in terms of sound quality is generally positive, with some users noting that the ear plugs isolate sound effectively, making music listening enjoyable. However, the noise cancellation feature seems to be a point of contention. Multiple users have reported that the noise cancellation during phone calls does not work as advertised, with the noise in the background often being louder than their speaking voice itself.

Features and Comparisons

Waterproofing: The original Tagg Inferno is known for its waterproofing capabilities, which the 2.0 version supposedly retains.

Battery Life: Both versions offer a 20-hour battery life, making them suitable for long listening sessions without needing a recharge.

Speaker Quality and Bass: Early reviews of the original Tagg Inferno highlighted its sound quality, although the user specifically noted a dislike for over-bass booster earphones. In contrast, the 2.0 version's sound quality is highly rated, suggesting improvements in sound isolation and possibly overall audio quality.

Real User Experiences

A recent purchase of the 2.0 version reveals that the sound quality is indeed good, though the user has not yet tested its waterproofing features. This inconsistency highlights the importance of verifying claims marketed by manufacturers.

The major drawback that some users find with the 2.0 model is the noise cancellation during phone calls. The user finds the reported noise cancellation benefits to be non-existent, indicating that there might be a discrepancy between the manufacturer's marketing claims and the actual product performance.

Conclusion

While the Tagg Inferno 2.0 offers improved sound quality and possibly better noise cancellation in certain scenarios, it significantly raises the price. For the upgraded features to justify the cost, potential buyers should carefully verify the product features, especially the noise cancellation that failed to meet the user's expectations.

Consumers considering purchasing either model should weigh these factors carefully and consider their specific use cases. The original Tagg Inferno remains a solid choice for those who prioritize battery life and basic sound quality, while the 2.0 model might be a better fit for those willing to pay extra for improved sound isolation.

The discrepancies between the advertised features and the user experiences suggest a need for manufacturers to be more transparent and accurate in their marketing.

Conclusion

When choosing between the original Tagg Inferno and the upgraded version, potential buyers should take into account their specific needs, such as sound quality, noise cancellation, and battery life. While the 2.0 version promises to offer enhanced features, it comes at a higher cost. The user experiences shared here can serve as valuable insights for making an informed decision.