Perceptions of Self-Publishing Authors Among Publishers

Self-publishing has become an increasingly popular route for authors, especially with the growing availability of digital platforms. However, perceptions of these authors among traditional publishers can vary significantly. This article explores how different publishers view self-publishing authors and the factors that influence these perceptions.

Perceptions Among Publishers

It is essential to understand that the mindset of publishers towards self-publishing authors can differ greatly depending on the publisher's approach and company culture. Some publishers are more accepting, while others may be quite reserved. For instance, publishers like Encircle Publications have been known to consider previously self-published works, as seen with the author of Driven.

Conversely, some publishers may outright reject self-published works, particularly if they require that submitted material be previously unpublished. In such cases, authors must adhere to the submission guidelines provided by the publisher to increase their chances of acceptance. This strict policy is common to ensure that the material submitted meets the quality standards the publisher has set.

Ignoring Self-Published Works

Many publishers treat self-published works with indifference, given that the vast majority of authors are self-published for personal reasons or market their own works without seeking a traditional deal. In these cases, publishers may feel that there is little to gain from paying attention to the work of a self-published author, especially without a track record or substantial sales.

Interestingly, the newspaper New York Times reported that 'no publishing company has folded because some author self-published,' highlighting the fact that self-publishing does not pose a significant threat to traditional publishers.

Perceptions of Low-Quality Work

Some publishers regard self-published authors with a certain level of skepticism, perceiving their work as lower quality. They may believe that self-published authors lack the proper background in writing and editing processes. This skepticism often stems from the false assumption that anyone can self-publish, making it challenging for new authors to obtain a publishing deal with a traditional publisher.

For example, a publisher may refuse to work with an author who has failed to address critical issues in their manuscript, such as grammar, plot, or character development. These issues, which a company hopes to rectify through the editing process, often lead to the rejection of self-published works. In some cases, authors may be perceived as prima donnas, unwilling to make the necessary changes to improve their work.

Symbiotic Relationship Between Traditional and Self-Publishing

However, it is also important to note that the relationship between traditional and self-publishing is not always adversarial. Many self-published authors have gone on to have successful careers, improving their works after receiving feedback and improving their manuscripts through further editing and polishing. This process can often bring about greater success and better engagement with a wider audience.

For instance, the critically acclaimed novel The Martian by Andy Weir was initially self-published before it was picked up by a publishing house, showcasing the potential symbiosis between the two approaches.

Ultimately, the perspective of publishers towards self-publishing authors can be complex and multifaceted. While some may be more accepting, others may have reservations, especially regarding the quality and marketability of the work. Nonetheless, the dynamics between publishers and self-publishing authors can evolve, as evidenced by the growing number of successful self-published authors who later receive traditional publishing offers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, publishers have varying perceptions of self-publishing authors, influenced by factors such as the quality of the work, the approach of the publisher, and the overall market landscape. While some publishers may be more open to self-published works, others may be more skeptical and reserved. Regardless, the landscape of publishing continues to evolve, offering authors multiple paths to success.

By understanding these perceptions, authors can make informed decisions about their publishing strategy, whether it involves self-publishing, seeking a traditional publisher, or a combination of both approaches.