Understanding the Perils of Dogma: A Revisit of 1984

Just recently, I finished re-reading George Orwell's seminal work, 1984. In light of the current political landscape, with figures like Trump's MAGA supporters, one might wonder if this thought-provoking literature could serve as a corrective to their mindset. Unfortunately, the answer is that they likely won't. This essay explores the parallels between 1984 and the beliefs of die-hard MAGA enthusiasts, and delves into the psychological underpinnings that keep them entrenched in their convictions.

The Shores of 1984: A MRY akin to It Can't Happen Here

1984 and It Can't Happen Here, a book by , are eerily similar in depicting totalitarianism. One striking issue with the MAGA cult is their unwavering belief in a small group of individuals, dismissing any contradictory evidence or contradicting voices as lies and conspiracies. They possess their own version of "truth" that is entirely divorced from actual facts. This stark resemblance to 1984's dystopian portrayal of a society where objective reality is controlled by a totalitarian regime is unsettling.

The Indoctrination and Echo Chamber Effect

The indoctrination of MAGA cultists is deeply entrenched. Change isn't as simple as reading a book; it is a complex psychological process. Just as was unable to be convinced to give up on Charles Manson despite his criminal activities, these believers’ obsession with Trump renders them exceedingly dangerous. Unlike Squeaky Fromme, who was criminally insane but still engaged in a futile and dangerous pursuit, many MAGA supporters are well-armed and dangerous, making them a significant threat.

The Sunk Cost Fallacy: An Analysis

A substantial part of the ongoing support for Trump, irrespective of his actions, can be attributed to the concept of 'sunk cost fallacy.' This fallacy occurs when individuals continue to invest in or support something despite clear signs of failure, due to the time, money, and emotional resources already invested. These MAGA supporters have invested so much in Trump that the loss of his presidency would be perceived as an extreme personal and national loss. They fear providing him up means abandoning a decade-long belief in a man who has repeatedly demonstrated his immorality, narcissism, and threats to democracy.

A Skeptic's Perspective

For those who believe in the cultural and ideological foundations of MAGA, losing Trump means more than just a political defeat; it signals the end of a belief system they've cherished for a decade. The disillusionment that would come from admitting his failures could be as painful as a personal betrayal. They see him not just as a leader but as a symbol of their identity, something they equate with their sense of moral and national self.

The refusal to accept his failings stems from a deep-seated reluctance to confront reality and the willingness to ignore or dismiss clear evidence of his wrongdoing. This denial echoes the protagonist in 1984, who remains loyal to a regime that is inherently corrupt and inhumane, because he's invested too much to change his mind.

Conclusion

The ongoing support for Trump among MAGA enthusiasts is not just about political belief but a deeply ingrained belief that challenges their identity. Breaking free from this stronghold requires more than just a book or a rational argument; it demands a transformative change in mindset. The lessons from 1984 serve as a reminder of the perils of dogma, where blind faith and indoctrination can lead to grotesque and dangerous outcomes.