Is Krishna at Peace with Zoroaster and Buddha for Breaking His Tradition?

Religion, as a faith-based system, has evolved through centuries with numerous traditions and practices. From the submerged city of Dwaraka, to the philosophical teachings of Zoroaster, Buddha, and Krishna, each religion has its own unique path. The Archaeological evidence of Dwaraka's submarine history serves as a reminder of the ancient foundations of these spiritual beliefs. However, it is important to recognize that belief is personal and subjective, and not necessarily dependent on the validation of one tradition over another.

Rigveda and the Emergence of Vishnu

The Rigveda, an ancient Sanskrit scripture, commemorates the greatness of Indra while simultaneously honoring Narayana, also known as Vishnu. The Purusha Sukta, a Vedic hymn, elaborates on the supreme attributes of Narayana. Krishna, as an avatar of Vishnu, holds significant religious importance. Some historians propose that he lived as early as 5000 BC, while others suggest he emerged around 3000 BC. These dates are not widely accepted, but they highlight the historical debate surrounding Krishna's existence.

The Sacred Nature of Tradition and Dharma

The concept of tradition is deeply rooted in religious and cultural practices. In Hinduism, an avatar like Krishna is seen as a guide and enforcer of dharma. If a tradition aligns with dharma, or righteousness, Krishna would uphold it. Conversely, if a tradition deviates from dharma, Krishna may intervene. This perspective suggests that Krishna's actions, such as breaking an Indra-centric tradition, were justified from a dharma standpoint.

Zoroaster and the Criticism of Indra

Zoroastrianism, founded by the Iranian prophet Zoroaster (or Zarathushtra), was a reaction against the traditional polytheistic practices. Zoroaster, as the author of The Gathas, critiqued the worship of deities like Indra. The Rigveda itself, while praising Indra, reveals a complex relationship with other deities:

Rigveda 10:27:1-25-6

This singer is my firm determination to aid the worshipper who pours the Soma. Slay the man who brings no milk-oblation unrighteous, powerful the truths perverter. Then will I when I lead my friends to battle against the radiant persons of the godless; prepare for thee at home a vigorous bullock and pour for thee the fifteen-fold strong juices...

Zoroaster's attack on demons, including those who denounce Indra, indicates a significant theological and ideological clash. The Zoroastrian narrative portrays Indra as a powerful deity who, in this context, is a demon. This marks a fundamental shift in religious perceptions, where Indra is no longer revered but is instead seen as an antagonist to Zoroastrian beliefs.

Krishna and the Flood of Indra

Krishna's actions, as recounted in the Shrimad Bhagavatam, involved breaking with Indra-centric traditions. In one story, the people of Vrindavan, influenced by Krishna, stopped an annual ceremony for Indra's appeasement. This led to Indra pouring heavy rains, attempting to flood the community. However, Krishna intervened, lifting Mount Govardhan and shielding the people with it, much like a giant umbrella.

This episode demonstrates Krishna's role as a protector and bearer of dharma. By challenging the worship of Indra, Krishna was aligning with a more evolved belief system, one that aligns more closely with Zoroastrian and Buddhist principles. Krishna's actions are not merely cultural but are rooted in a deeper philosophical and ethical dimension.

Conclusion

While Krishna, Zoroaster, and Buddha all challenge traditional religious practices, their approaches reflect different spiritual journeys and beliefs. Krishna's actions, in breaking with the tradition of Indra worship, were justified through the lens of dharma. Similarly, the Zoroastrian critique of Indra, as well as the Buddhist emphasis on peace and non-violence, offer alternative perspectives on spirituality and tradition. These traditions, while distinct, share a common thread in their pursuit of truth and righteousness.