Defining Literature: A Case Study in Categorizing Music

When we discuss literature, we often narrow our focus to literary texts, which encompass novels, poetry, essays, and plays. However, the concept of literature is broader, and it can be extended to include other forms of artistic expression, including songs. This article will explore the criteria for calling a piece of writing—or, in this case, a song—literature, using a case study of The Beatles and Mott the Hoople.

Criteria for Literature

The question of what can be considered literature often revolves around two key factors: subjective value and lasting cultural impact. If a piece of writing, or song, has enduring worth and significance, it is more likely to be regarded as literature. This enduring significance is not just a matter of personal opinion but also the recognition it garners within the broader cultural and academic contexts.

The Beatles: A Case of Literary Status in Music

One clear example of a song achieving literary status is The Beatles. Their contributions to the cultural landscape are well-known and deeply ingrained in popular culture. The evolution of their music and the evolution of their lyrics over the years showcase a form of poetic expression that is both innovative and timeless. The Beatles' songs are studied in academic settings, celebrated by music enthusiasts, and still resonate with new generations of listeners.

Mott the Hoople: A Counterpoint to Literary Status in Music

In contrast, Mott the Hoople, despite their brief stint as a popular band in the 1970s, did not achieve the same level of lasting impact. While the band had their moments of success, such as the hit single "All the Young Dudes" written by David Bowie in 1972, the collective body of their work is not as widely recognized or studied. This is not to diminish their talent or the quality of their music, but rather to highlight the importance of enduring cultural impact.

The Subjective Nature of Value

One of the most significant factors in determining whether a song can be considered literature is its subjective value. The Beatles' music possesses a universal resonance that transcends time and cultural boundaries. Their lyrics often explore themes of love, rebellion, and personal growth, which speak to a wide range of human experiences. In contrast, Mott the Hoople's music, while enjoyable, did not achieve the same level of cultural spread and recognition.

Timelessness and Influence

Another key criterion is the longevity and influence of the work. Literature, in its broader sense, tends to withstand the test of time. The Beatles' music has stood the test of time, remaining relevant and cherished by fans over several decades. Their influence can be felt in numerous musical genres and styles, demonstrating the lasting impact and literary quality of their work. Mott the Hoople, while undoubtedly talented, did not achieve the same level of widespread and lasting cultural influence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision to categorize a song as literature hinges on its subjective value and lasting cultural impact. The Beatles exemplify this with their timeless and influential body of work, while Mott the Hoople, despite their ability to create memorable songs, did not achieve the same level of cultural significance. Understanding these factors can help us better appreciate and analyze the artistic merit of both literary texts and musical compositions.