Critiques of Brandon Sanderson’s 'The Wheel of Time' Series

The 'The Wheel of Time' series, penned by the renowned author Brandon Sanderson, has gained immense popularity. However, like many beloved works of fiction, the series has faced its fair share of criticism. This article delves into the common critiques raised by readers and critics alike, examining the issues of originality, complexity, character management, and narrative conclusion.

Lack of Originality

One of the most recurring criticisms of 'The Wheel of Time' series is its perceived lack of originality. Critics argue that the series borrows heavily from the classical fantasy genre, particularly the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy by J.R.R. Tolkien. This similarity can be seen in the intricate world-building, the presence of multiple races, and the overarching theme of epic quests and destiny.

Complex World Building

'The Wheel of Time' series is renowned for its elaborate world-building, which includes multiple continents, complex political intrigue, and a diverse array of cultures and races. While this depth of detail can be a strength, it also presents a significant challenge for new readers. Critics argue that the complexity can sometimes detract from the narrative, making it difficult for readers to fully engage with the story and its characters.

Overwhelming Number of Characters

A widely mentioned drawback of 'The Wheel of Time' is its large cast of characters. With dozens of protagonists and supporting characters, it can be challenging for readers to keep track of who is who and understand the importance of each individual. This abundance of characters can lead to a sense of disconnection, where readers may feel alienated from the core characters and their motivations.

Convoluted Ending

The final book of the series, 'The Gathering Storm', has been the subject of considerable criticism. Despite building up to a high excitement level throughout the series, the resolution of key plot points is seen as rushed and unsatisfying. Many readers felt that the climax did not live up to the intensity and suspense established in earlier books, leaving them feeling disappointed and unsatisfied.

Is Brandon Sanderson’s Stylization of Characters Reasonable?

Brandon Sanderson’s characterizations, particularly the evolution of Mat Cauthon, have drawn significant criticism. Critics argue that Mat’s transformation into a more dramatic and acting-oriented character seems out of place and does not align with his previously established personality. Although Sanderson’s handling of other characters, such as Perrin and Rand, is generally well-received, the reimagining of Mat can be a source of frustration for some readers.

While Sanderson’s methods in altering Mat’s personality could be seen as effective from a storytelling perspective, they do not always align with the pre-existing perception of the character. This incongruity can be jarring for readers who have grown attached to Mat’s original traits.

Conclusion

Brandon Sanderson’s 'The Wheel of Time' series, despite its overwhelming success and popularity, is not without its challenges. Critics point to issues such as a lack of originality, overly complex narrative, and a large cast of characters as areas for improvement. While the series has its strengths, these critiques highlight aspects that could benefit from refinement in future works.

Ultimately, while 'The Wheel of Time' may not be for everyone, its intricate world and engaging characters continue to captivate a wide audience. Whether or not one agrees with the criticisms, the series remains an important contribution to the fantasy genre, sparking debate and discussion among readers and critics alike.