Controversies Surrounding Era Names in Post-War Japan: The Case of Heisei and Beyond

Japan's system of using era names, or inguiri, has a rich history dating back to the 7th century. However, since the Second World War, the era name selection process has undergone significant changes. The choice of Heisei and its successor Reiwa have sparked controversies, questions, and discussions within Japanese society. This article delves into the debates and controversies surrounding these era names.

The Historical Context and Significance of Era Names

Era names in Japan are significant for more than just historical and cultural purposes. They are considered symbolic of the rule of a shogun or emperor and are closely tied to political events. Since the Meiji Restoration in 1868, the system of ingyori, which includes the inguiri and the logos of the era, has evolved into a complex and fascinating aspect of Japanese governance.

The selection of Heisei, which means 'Achieving Peace' and was used from 1989 to 2019, is a testament to the desire for peace and stability after the tumultuous times of World War II and the Cold War. This choice reflected a period of significant domestic and international changes in Japan.

The Controversy Surrounding Heisei

Despite the positive connotations of the name, the selection of Heisei also faced some controversies. The Japanese public, media, and the government were divided on the appropriateness of the name. Some argued that Heisei did not accurately reflect the current state of Japanese society, especially given the country's declining birth rate and aging population. Critics also pointed out that the traditional naming conventions might be outdated and were not as widely applicable or relevant in the modern era.

The Choice of Reiwa: A New Era Name

Crown Prince Naruhito, who ascended the throne in May 2019, officially chose the name Reiwa for his reign. The name Reiwa comes from the Man'yōshū, one of the oldest and most influential collections of Japanese poetry. It means 'Harmony of Seasons,' symbolizing a renewed era of prosperity and progress. The choice of Reiwa signifies the effort to reconnect with Japan's ancient cultural roots and to evoke a sense of continuity with the country's past.

However, the choice of Reiwa was not without its critics. Some argued that the name did not convey a clear message or direction for the future. Others believed that the traditional naming system might no longer resonate with the modern Japanese populace, who increasingly seek relevance and clarity in cultural symbols.

Controversies and Debates

The selection of both Heisei and Reiwa has raised several important questions and debates. What should an era name reflect, and how can it best serve the interests of a contemporary nation? Is there a risk of outdated traditions perpetuating a disconnect from modern values and societal needs? These questions continue to be a subject of discussion in Japan.

Moreover, the choice of an era name is more than just a ceremonial decision. It impacts various aspects of Japanese society, including media, education, historical records, and cultural practices. The ongoing debates highlight the challenge of balancing tradition and innovation in the 21st century.

Finding a Middle Ground

In conclusion, the choice of era names in post-war Japan, with the cases of Heisei and Reiwa, has been a topic of intense debate and controversy. While the traditional naming system has deep historical and cultural significance, there is a need to find a middle ground that respects these traditions while also addressing modern societal needs and expectations.

The current approach of names derived from classical literary sources, like the choice of Reiwa, reflects an effort to bridge the gap between the past and present. However, as Japan continues to evolve, the criteria and process for choosing era names will need to adapt to ensure their relevance and meaningfulness for future generations.

Keywords: era name, Heisei, Reiwa

Backlinks:

Japan Government Asahi Shimbun Yomiuri Shimbun