Are Errors from the 1769 King James Version Found in the Book of Mormon?

Leading questions often contain hidden traps and assumptions, and one such question frequently posed relates to the King James Version (KJV) of 1769 and its alleged errors appearing in the The Book of Mormon. I had heard about how 'everybody' knows that a particular passage from that particular edition of the Bible is incorrect and was used by Joseph Smith. However, after thorough research, I haven't encountered any specific example yet. While I appreciate the intention behind the leading question, it would indeed be more effective if it were crafted without an inherent trap. So, let's dive into this inquiry:

Existence of Errors

The question itself presupposes that we can identify and determine what is in error. We must consider the basis for such determinations: should we compare it to:

Passed translations The original manuscripts The word of God as it is revealed to individuals

Understanding the translation process is equally crucial. Was Joseph Smith’s translation of the Bible a strictly word-for-word process, or did he use a different method, as he did with the Kinderhook plates? This raises the question of whether the 1769 KJV served as his primary source, and if so, whether he would have read through it and applied his own understanding of the scriptures to it. In the absence of evidence, we cannot confidently assert any errors directly from this particular version.

The Role of Joseph Smith as a Translator

Joseph Smith was a translator, and his process was a unique one. As someone who had grown and developed as both a seer and a person, his translation of the Book of Mormon evolved over time as his knowledge and capability increased. Similarly, when translating the Bible, he would have used what was available to him at that time.

Joseph’s translation of the Bible from the 1769 KJV can be seen in the context of other translations. The Doctrine and Covenants (DC 91:1–6), for example, provides insight into how the Prophet viewed the Apocrypha:

V

erily thus saith the Lord unto you concerning the Apocrypha—There are many things contained therein that are true and it is mostly translated correctly. There are many things contained therein that are not true which are interpolations by the hands of men. Verily I say unto you that it is not needful that the Apocrypha should be translated. Therefore whoso readeth it let him understand for the Spirit manifesteth truth. And whoso is enlightened by the Spirit shall obtain benefit therefrom. And whoso receiveth not by the Spirit cannot be benefited. Therefore it is not needful that it should be translated. Amen.

Reflecting on this revelation, even if we do not accept the Lord’s words, this scripture offers an explanation for the possibility of errors remaining in the text. The introduction of the Holy Spirit can interpret and reveal the true meaning, which does not necessitate a formal translation for benefit.

The Changing Perspective on Joseph Smith and Prophets

My perspective on this subject has significantly evolved as I began to understand the role of a prophet more broadly and the specific roles of some prophets, including Joseph Smith. His translation of the Book of Mormon and his approach to translating the Bible demonstrate a unique methodology. These insights help me to comprehend the criticisms and complaints about his “failings” and “falsehoods.” Many of these come from a misunderstanding of what a prophet is, how they operate, and the significance of their role.

Challenging the assumption of what a prophet is often leads to a strawman argument. This mischaracterization of prophets can overshadow the genuine discussions about their purpose and capabilities. A prophet’s role generally involves revealing truths, guiding the people, and preparing the way for significant events. Joseph Smith was specifically responsible for opening a dispensation before the return of Jesus Christ, a role that required a unique set of skills and understandings.

Conclusion

The question regarding errors from the 1769 King James Version found in the Book of Mormon deserves careful consideration. Without concrete evidence, we cannot confidently assert the presence of errors. Instead, it is more productive to understand the process by which Joseph Smith translated scriptures, the role of the Holy Spirit in interpretation, and the evolving nature of the Prophet's knowledge and understanding.