Introduction to the Question and the Historical Context

Amidst the legendary tales of the Seven Kingdoms, Aegon the Conqueror stands as one of the most pivotal figures in the history of Westeros. Many readers often wonder if Aegon the Conqueror, in his quest to build the Targaryen dynasty, might have chosen an unconventional line of succession. Specifically, one might ponder whether he selected his sisters' sons as potential heirs over their own children. Was he so determined to consolidate power that he would discard traditional notions of dynastic legitimacy? This article delves into the intricate dynamics of succession in the Westerosi history, guided by the fictional yet profound realm of 'A Song of Ice and Fire,' and 'Game of Thrones.'

Understanding the Traditional Dynasty

The Targaryen family, boasting the most potent and influential bloodline in Westeros, was deeply entrenched in their belief that dynastic unity was paramount for their rule. Aegon the Conqueror, a formidable king, was as much a warrior as he was a politician. His siblings, Rhaera and Visenya, played crucial roles in his conquests. Rhaenys, his sister, though less involved in military matters, was a key figure in consolidating the Targaryen lineage.

In Westeros, the principle of agnatic primogeniture prevailed, indicating that the firstborn male would inherit the throne. This was the expectation based on the Targaryen practice. However, Aegon's complex personal and political decisions might have led him to consider a different approach, especially when faced with a threatened dynasty.

Historical Evidence from the Books and Series

Upon downloading and carefully analyzing the series 'A Song of Ice and Fire,' and the television adaptation 'Game of Thrones,' there is no concrete evidence to suggest that Aegon the Conqueror deliberately chose his sisters' sons to succeed him over their children. The primary heirs of Aegon I Targaryen were his legitimate and illegitimate children, such as Viserys I and Aegon II respectively, along with his grandsons and great-grandsons.

Visenya, Aegon's sister, was known for her support of her husband's ambitions and her unwavering loyalty to the Targaryen line. Nevertheless, there is no textual or visual evidence to substantiate the claim that Aegon the Conqueror considered passing the throne to her sons, who were more likely crowned after his death under the pretext of their lineage through him.

The Romantization of Fictional Legitimacy vs. Authorial Choices

It is understandable to romanticize Aegon’s potential for such an unconventional move, especially in a fantasized setting. However, it is vital to distinguish between desirable fiction and authorial intent. George R. R. Martin, the author of 'A Song of Ice and Fire,' oftentimes subverts expectations and creates complex narratives to engage readers. In a hypothetical scenario, Aegon might have shown interest in ensuring his sisters’ sons were eligible for the crown, but the books depict no explicit evidence of such a plan.

The decision to choose an unexpected heir often aligns with plot devices. For instance, it can create tension, intrigue, and complicate the lineage, which could be crucial storytelling techniques used by the writer. Nevertheless, in the context of Aegon's reign, the clear focus of the narrative is on the direct descendants of Aegon himself.

Alternative Theories and Debates

Many fans and scholars debate the legitimacy of alternate theories for potential heirs. Some argue that Aegon’s successor might have been his youngest son of a morganatic marriage, who would have been illegitimate but still part of the Targaryen bloodline. However, the canonical accounts consistently place Viserys I as Aegon I's acknowledged heir, either directly by birth or through marriage alliances.

Another fascinating aspect of succession in Westeros is the concept of an Iron Throne "bastard." Historical contexts in 'A Song of Ice and Fire' often highlight instances where bastards could challenge and even usurp the throne. However, the legitimacy and acceptance of such claims are often tenuous and subject to negotiation and force.

Conclusion: The True Depth of Dynastic Legitimacy in Westeros

The Targaryen dynasty, unlike some other Westerosi houses, was built on the solidity of blood and iron. Aegon the Conqueror's choice of direct heirs, including Valeration and the Targaryen offspring, underscores the firm belief in traditional succession. While the fictional realm of Westeros entertains many intriguing possibilities, the books provide a clear narrative path for Aegon I's heirs, supported by significant textual evidence.

Understanding the layers of dynastic legitimacy in Westeros not only helps in appreciating the intricate plot of 'A Song of Ice and Fire' and 'Game of Thrones' but also highlights the author's deliberate choices in shaping the world's history.

References

1. Martin, George R. R. (2011). A Game of Thrones. Bantam Books.

2. Martin, George R. R. (2013). A Storm of Swords. Bantam Books.

3. Martin, George R. R. (2011). A Clash of Kings. Bantam Books.

4. Guerrasio, Jeff. "The Targaryen Timeline Of Westeros History." A Game of Thrones.